대한대장항문학회

Purpose: A barium enema is frequently performed to check for healing prior to ileostomy closure, but there have been reports that ileostomy closure without a contrast study is safe in selected patients. The aim of this study was to assess the necessity of a routine barium enema prior to ileostomy closure. Methods: Between January 1994 and June 2005, 51 patients with a temporary loop ileostomy who had a barium enema prior to ileostomy closure at Chonbuk National University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were divided into 2 groups, the protective ileostomy group and the ileostomy-after-leakage group. To examine the necessity of a routine barium enema prior to ileostomy closure, we assessed whether the barium enema results changed management and whether there were pelvic sepsis and obstructive symptoms following ileostomy closure. Results: In the protective ileostomy group (n=39), the barium enema was performed after a mean of 59 days (range: 27∼151 days). There were no abnormal findings at the barium enema, no schedule changes, no pelvic sepsis, and no obstructive symptoms following ileostomy closure. In the ileostomy-after-leakage group (n=12), the barium enema was performed after a mean of 54 days (range: 30∼82 days). In 2 patients, with barium enemas at 33 days and 36 days, an anastomotic leakage was found, and ileostomy closure was delayed. Conclusions: In patients with a protective ileostomy, a barium enema prior to ileostomy closure is unnecessary, but in patients with an ileostomy after leakage, barium enema should be considered. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2006;22:298-300