³í¹® »ó¼¼ º¸±â
(PDF file / 7 pages)
View
| Down
Title
Flexible Rectal Stent for Obstructing Colonic Neoplasms
Author
1Je Hoon Park, 1So Hyang Oh, 1Woo Yong Lee, 1Ho Kyung Chun, 2Sung Wook Choo, 2Young Soo Do
Place of duty
Publicationinfo
Journal of Korean Soc Coloproctol 2000 | Vol.16 No.4 | 267 ~ 273, 7 pages
Keyword
ÀåÆó»ö; ¾Ç¼ºÁ¾¾ç; Flexible rectal stent; Intestinal obstruction; Malignant neoplasm;
Abstract
Purpose : Acute lower gastrointestinal obstruction due to colorectal neoplasm is a common
clinical problem, which frequently requires emergency operation. Morbidity and mortality
associated with emergency operation is relatively high, and almost all requires a multi-stage
operation. Recently flexible rectal stent has been emerged as an alternative for the
management of acute lower gastrointestinal obstruction due to colorectal neoplasm. Thus we
analyzed the results of flexible rectal stent treatment for acute lower gastrointestinal
obstruction due to colorectal neoplasm. Methods : From June 1996 to May 1999 47 patients
with acute malignant lower gastrointestinal obstruction were included in this study, medical
records of these patients were reviewed retrospectively. Results : Of 47 patients 19 were male
and 28 were women, with a mean age of 57.3 years (33¡77 years). Male to female ratio was
1£º1.47. Causes of acute intestinal obstruction were as follows: rectal cancer, 17 patients;
sigmoid colon cancer, 18 patients; descending colon cancer, 3 patients; ascending colon cancer,
1 patient; stomach cancer, 5 patients; gall bladder cancer, 1 patient; and uterine cervix cancer,
1 patient; and ovarian cancer, 1 patient. Stent insertion was indicated as palliative treatment
in 22 patients and preoperative decompression in 25 patients. Successful stent insertions were
achieved in 40 patients (85.1%). Stent insertion was successful in 20 patients (91.0%) among
the 22 patients treated for palliation. Stent insertion was successfully achieved in 20 patients
(80.0%) among the 25 patients. Stent insertion failure was observed in 7 patients (14.9%).
Stent failed due to the complete obstruction, 3 patients; long segmental lesion, 1 patient;
anatomic abnormality, 1 patient; multiple lesions, 1 patient, and ultra-low rectal lesion, 1
patient. Colonoscopy-assisted stent insertion was performed in 5 patients. Post-stent
complications occurred in 12 patients among the 40 patients (30.0%): stent migration, 8
patients; expansion failure, 2 patients; fecal incontinence, 1 patient; and malposition, 1 patient.
The interval between stent insertion and operation was from 1 to 30 days with a median of
7 days. Elective operations were performed as follows: anterior resection, 6 patients; low
anterior resection, 7 patients; Miles' operation, 3 patients; sigmoid colostomy, 3 patients; and
transverse colostomy, 1 patient. Mean distal resection margin of specimen was 2.3 cm. No
postoperative complication was seen. Conclusions : Multi-stage operation can be avoided with
flexible rectal stent without increasing postoperative complications. Complication rate was
relatively high in patients whom stent were inserted for palliative intent. Combined
colonoscopy increased the successful rate in difficult cases. Immediate operation should be
considered for the patients with long segmental lesion, multiple lesions, ultra-low rectal
lesion, and when perforation is suspected.
Á¦ ¸ñ
Æó»ö¼º ´ëÀå¾Ï¿¡¼ Flexible Rectal Stent¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ä¡·á °á°ú
Àú ÀÚ
1¹ÚÁ¦ÈÆ, 1¿À¼ÒÇâ, 1ÀÌ¿ì¿ë, 1ÀüÈ£°æ, 2ÁÖ¼º¿í, 2µµ¿µ¼ö
¼Ò ¼Ó
1¹ÚÁ¦ÈÆ/1¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼¿ïº´¿ø ÀϹݿܰú, 1¿À¼ÒÇâ/2¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼¿ïº´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú, 1ÀÌ¿ì¿ë/, 1ÀüÈ£°æ/, 2ÁÖ¼º¿í/, 2µµ¿µ¼ö/
ÃâÆÇÁ¤º¸
´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 2000 | 16±Ç 4È£ 267 ~ 273, 7 pages
Å°¿öµå
ÀåÆó»ö; ¾Ç¼ºÁ¾¾ç; Flexible rectal stent; Intestinal obstruction; Malignant neoplasm;