³í¹® »ó¼¼ º¸±â
(PDF file / 8 pages)
View
| Down
Title
A Role of Anorectal Physiologic Study for the Diagnosis of Chronic Constipation
Author
Seung Han Kim, Yong Hee Hwang, Kun Phil Choi
Place of duty
Publicationinfo
Journal of Korean Soc Coloproctol 2000 | Vol.16 No.4 | 231 ~ 238, 8 pages
Keyword
º¯ºñ; ¹èº¯Á¶¿µ¼ú; ´ëÀåÅë°ú½Ã°£ ÃøÁ¤¼ú; ±ÙÀüµµ °Ë»ç; Ä¡°ñÁ÷Àå±Ù À̿ϺÎÀüÁõ; Constipation; Defecography; Colon transit time; Electromyography; Non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome;
Abstract
Purpose : To assess the role of anorectal physiologic study for the diagnosis of chronic
idiopathic constipation. Methods : A retrospective study of 81 constipated patients (23 male,
58 female) of mean age 48 16.6 (16¡83) years who had no abnormalities in colonoscopy,
barium enema, and rectal exam was done. 81 patients underwent defecography and
cine-defecography, of which 66 patients underwent anal manometry, 52 patients underwent
colonic transit time study (CTT), and 27 patients underwent anal plug electromyography
(EMG). Results : Nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome (NRPR), rectocele, rectal
intussusception, anal dyschezia, and sigmoidocele were observed in 27 (33.3%), 26 (32.1%), 14
(17.3%), 3 (3.7%), and 2 (2.5%) of the patients, respectively. Normal cinedefecography finding
was observed in 21 (25.9%) patients. More than one abnormal finding was found in 11
(13.6%) patients. Abnormal findings included colonic inertia in 6 (11.5%) patients and pelvic
outlet obstruction in 2 (3.8%) patients. Normal colon transit time was observed in 44 (84.6%)
patients. Anal hypertonia was observed in 23 (34.8%) patients by anal monometry, of which
3 patients were diagnosed with anal dyschezia in cinedefecography. 13 (48.1%) patients were
diagnosed with NRPR in anal plug EMG. The correlation rate between
cinedefecography/EMG, defecography/CTT, and CTT/EMG were 81.5%, 61.5%, and 51.9%
respectively in the diagnosis of NRPR. Sensitivities of the three tests were 72.7% for
cinedefecography, 66.7% for EMG, and 7.7% for CTT in diagnosing NRPR (p£¼0.05). Positive
predictive values of the three tests were 80% for anal plug EMG, 72.7% for cinedefecography,
and 50% for CTT in the diagnosis of NRPR. Conclusions : Defecography and EMG were
complements each of the other in diagnosis of pelvic outlet obstruction especially NRPR, but
CTT has no role.
Á¦ ¸ñ
¸¸¼º º¯ºñÀÇ Áø´ÜÀ» À§ÇÑ ´ëÀåÇ×¹® ±â´É°Ë»çÀÇ ¿ªÇÒ
Àú ÀÚ
±è½ÂÇÑ, Ȳ¿ëÈñ, ÃÖ°ÇÇÊ
¼Ò ¼Ó
±è½ÂÇÑ/¼¿ïÀ§»ýº´¿ø ÀϹݿܰú, Ȳ¿ëÈñ/, ÃÖ°ÇÇÊ/
ÃâÆÇÁ¤º¸
´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 2000 | 16±Ç 4È£ 231 ~ 238, 8 pages
Å°¿öµå
º¯ºñ; ¹èº¯Á¶¿µ¼ú; ´ëÀåÅë°ú½Ã°£ ÃøÁ¤¼ú; ±ÙÀüµµ °Ë»ç; Ä¡°ñÁ÷Àå±Ù À̿ϺÎÀüÁõ; Constipation; Defecography; Colon transit time; Electromyography; Non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome;