³í¹® »ó¼¼ º¸±â
(PDF file / 8 pages)
View
| Down
Title
Physiologic Characteristics and its Clinical Significances in the Patients with Pelvic Outlet Obstruction
Author
2¹Ú¿õä, 12Soon Sup Chung, 12Seung Hwa Park
Place of duty
Publicationinfo
Journal of Korean Soc Coloproctol 2000 | Vol.16 No.4 | 215 ~ 222, 8 pages
Keyword
Pelvic outlet obstruction; Nonrelaxing puborectalis; Rectocele; Anal dyschezia; Rectoanal intussusception;
Abstract
Purpose : Current study was designed to assess the functional etiology of patients
with pelvic outlet obstruction. Moreover, physiologic characteristics and theirs clinical
significances were evaluated in the patients with ramified diagnosis. Methods : 172
patients with pelvic outlet obstruction were performed 328 numbers of physiologic
studies. These included cinedefecography (n=172), anal manometry (n=87), colonic transit
time study (n=38), and anal EMG/PNTML (n=31). On the basis of physiologic findings,
patient groups were categorized as rectocele (group I), nonrelaxing puborectalis
syndrome (group II), anal dyschezia (group III), and rectoanal intussusception (group
IV). The physiologic findings were compared between subgroup patients. Results :
Incidence of categorized patients was 51.7% (group I, n=89), 22.7% (group II, n=39),
12.2% (group III, n=21), and 8.7% (group IV, n=15), respectively. The mean age of
patients with group III were lower (p£¼0.05) than that of overall patients. The incidence
of female patients was higher in group I and the incidence of male patients was higher
in group II (p£¼0.0001). In cinedefecography, patients with group II showed smaller
anorectal angle at strain (p£¼0.001), at dynamic change between rest and strain
(p=0.002). In anal manometry, patients with group III showed higher mean resting
pressures (p=0.001), higher maximum resting pressures (p£¼0.001), higher mean squeeze
pressures, and higher maximal voluntary contraction (p=0.003) than those of patients
with other group. In neurologic study, mean value of PNTML was 2.32 0.34 (range,
1.60¡3.66) msec in overall patients. The size of rectocele was increased in proportion to
patient's age (r=0.229, p£¼0.05), number of delivery (r=0.393, p=0.001), and degree of
perineal descent (r=0.231, p£¼0.05). The degree of perineal descent was increased in
proportion to patient's age (r=0.249, p£¼0.05). Conclusions : Present series provided the
diagnostic ramification of pelvic outlet obstruction by using the anorectal physiologic
investigations. In addition to the function of puborectalis muscle, evacuation dynamics of
anorectum should be emphasized. These findings could provide the fundamental
information for guideline of future therapy in the patients with obstructed defecation.
Á¦ ¸ñ
°ñ¹ÝÇϱ¸ÀÇ ±â´ÉÀû Æó¼â ȯÀÚ¿¡¼ »ý¸®Àû Ư¼º°ú ÀÓ»óÀû ÀÇ¹Ì ¿¬±¸
Àú ÀÚ
1, 12Á¤¼ø¼·, 12¹Ú½ÂÈ
¼Ò ¼Ó
1/1°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç, 2¹Ú¿õä/2°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÇغÎÇб³½Ç, 1/, 2Á¤¼ø¼·/, 1/, 2¹Ú½ÂÈ/
ÃâÆÇÁ¤º¸
´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 2000 | 16±Ç 4È£ 215 ~ 222, 8 pages
Å°¿öµå
Pelvic outlet obstruction; Nonrelaxing puborectalis; Rectocele; Anal dyschezia; Rectoanal intussusception;