³í¹® »ó¼¼ º¸±â
(PDF file / 11 pages)
View
| Down
Title
Sphincter Repair for Fecal Incontinence after Obstetric Injury
Author
Kwang Woo Ahn, Sang Jeon Lee, Jin Woo Park
Place of duty
Publicationinfo
Journal of Korean Soc Coloproctol 1999 | Vol.15 No.1 | 9 ~ 19, 11 pages
Keyword
Sphincter repair; Fecal incontinence; Obstetric injury;
Abstract
Purpose : We designed this study to evaluate efficacy of sphincter repair and factors
influencing in patients with postobstetric fecal incontinence. Methods : Twenty-one patients
(mean age 42 years; range 23¡67) undergoing sphincter repair for postobstetric fecal
incontinence (mean duration 12 years; range 6 months¡46 years) were evaluated
prospectively. Preoperatively, standardized interviews, anorectal manometry and measure
ment of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) were performed. Incontinence was
graded according to the Parks' classification: Grade 1 - continence to stool and flatus; Grade
2 - incontinent to flatus, some urgency to stool present but no incontinence; Grade 3 -
incontinent to liquid stool; Grade 4 - incontinent to formed stool. Sphincter repair methods
were overlap repair of external anal sphincter (EAS) in 4 patients, overlap repair of EAS with
anterior levatorplasty in 15 patients, and overlap repair of EAS with anterior levatorplasty and
postanal repair in 2 patients. Anorectal manometry at 3 months, and interviews at 3 months
and 6 months after sphincter repair were performed again. Patients' satisfaction was
classified as excellent, good, fair, and no improvement. Results : Difficulty in first delivery
was noticed in 18 patients and history of previous sphincter repair was noticed in 5 patients.
Preoperatively, most patients showed high grade incontinence (grade 3 in 13 and grade 4 in
8 patients). After sphincter repair, 18 patients (85.7%) became grade 1 or 2, and 16 patients
(76.2%) replied their functional satisfaction excellent or good. There were no difference
between the results at 3 months and 6 months. Poor functional outcome was in 2 of 3
patients with bilaterally prolonged preoperative PNTML. Short duration of incontinence and
young age at the time of repair favored good results. Previous sphincter repair did not
influence the outcome. Postoperatively both anal pressure and high pressure zone length were
significantly increased in patients with improved continence. Postoperative complications were
wound infection in 2 patients and necrosis at the apex of the advancement skin flap in 1 case
but these did not influence the outcome. Conclusions : Most postobstetric fecal incontinence
can be successfully treated with sphincter repair. Excellent results are expected when the
duration of incontinence is short and the patients are young. Pudendal neuropathy seemed to
be related to poor outcome.
Á¦ ¸ñ
»ê°úÀû ¼Õ»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ º¯½Ç±Ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ý¾à±Ù º¹¿ø¼ú
Àú ÀÚ
¾È±¤¿ì, ÀÌ»óÀü, ¹ÚÁø¿ì
¼Ò ¼Ó
¾È±¤¿ì/ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç, ÀÌ»óÀü/, ¹ÚÁø¿ì/
ÃâÆÇÁ¤º¸
´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 1999 | 15±Ç 1È£ 9 ~ 19, 11 pages
Å°¿öµå
Sphincter repair; Fecal incontinence; Obstetric injury;