³í¹® »ó¼¼ º¸±â
(PDF file / 8 pages)
View
| Down
Title
Clinical Significance of Defecography in Patients with Constipation
Author
Ho Young Kwon, Kwang Ho Kim, Kang Sub Shim, Eung Bum Park
Place of duty
Publicationinfo
Journal of Korean Soc Coloproctol 1999 | Vol.15 No.3 | 195 ~ 202, 8 pages
Keyword
Constipation; Defecography; Colonic transit time;
Abstract
Purpose : To evaluate the clinical usefulness of defecogrophy in diagnosing the etiology and
pathophysiology of constipation. A retrospective study of 56 constipated patients who had no
abnormalities in colonoscopy, barium enema and rectal exam were done. Methods : Fifty-six
patients (12 men, 44 women) with constipation underwent defecography and 37 of the patients
underwent colonic transit studies. Fluoroscopically guided defecography was performed with
barium paste introduced into the rectum. Results : Normal defecography finding was observed
in thirteen of the 56 patients. Rectocele, spastic levator syndrome (nonrelaxing puborectalis
syndrome), sigmoidocele, rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception were observed in 67% (38/56),
30% (20/56), 7% (4/56), 5% (3/56) and 2% (1/56) of the patients, respectively. More than one
pathological finding was found in 23 (53%) patients. Of the 38 rectoceles, 17 cases were found
to be associated with spastic levator syndrome. In solitary rectocele, the anorectal angles at
rest, during straining were 92.65 9.08? 108.09 14.35? while 99.85 11.85? 95.90 17.8
4? in spastic levator syndrome. In 36 difficult bowel movements, 66% (24/36), 30% (11/36),
3% (1/36) were found to have rectocele, spastic levator syndrome, and sigmoidocele,
respectively. Normal colonic transit time was observed in twenty six of the 37 patients.
Abnormal findings included colonic inertia in 3 (8%) patients, hindgut dysfunction in 4 (11%)
patients, and, outlet obstruction in 4 (11%) patients. Of the normal colonic transit time in 26,
rectocele in sixteen, rectal prolapse in 1, spastic levator in 2 were observed. Rectoceles were
observed in 2 out of 3 colonic inertia, in all 4 hindgut dysfunction, in 1 out of 4 outlet
obstruction. Conclusions : Our findings suggest that constipation is often a disorder of
defecation rather than an impairment of colonic motility. Defecography should be considered
first of all in evaluating the pathophysiology of constipation, especially for whom complaining
of difficult bowel.
Á¦ ¸ñ
º¯ºñ ȯÀÚ¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ ¹èº¯Á¶¿µ¼úÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû ÀÇÀÇ
Àú ÀÚ
±ÇÈ£¿µ, ±è±¤È£, ½É°¼·, ¹ÚÀÀ¹ü
¼Ò ¼Ó
±ÇÈ£¿µ/ÀÌÈ¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç, ±è±¤È£/, ½É°¼·/, ¹ÚÀÀ¹ü/
ÃâÆÇÁ¤º¸
´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 1999 | 15±Ç 3È£ 195 ~ 202, 8 pages
Å°¿öµå
Constipation; Defecography; Colonic transit time;