³í¹® »ó¼¼ º¸±â
(PDF file / 10 pages)
View
| Down
Title
Comparative Analysis of Open Versus Semi-Closed Hemorrhoidectomy for 200 Cases of Hemorrhoids
Author
Woo Young Son, Myung Suk Sim, Jin Kook Kang
Place of duty
Publicationinfo
Journal of Korean Soc Coloproctol 1997 | Vol.13 No.3 | 451 ~ 460, 10 pages
Keyword
Hemorrhoids;
Abstract
Conventional hemorrhoidectomy is still the main stairway to the treatment of the third
or the fourth degree hemorrhoids. Among the various methods of hemorrhoidectomy,
open hemonhoidectomy is claimed to decrease postoperative pain and wound infection,
but to have disadvantage of long period of wound healing. Semi-closed
hemorrhoidectomy has the advantage of rapid wound healing without increased risk of
wound infection, but more painful postoperative course than open hemorrhoidectomy is
suggested. To assess this conventional concept, two hundreds of patients were randomly
allocated to either an open hemorrhoidectomy(Group 4, Operated by modified Goligher
method, n=100) or a semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy(Group B, Operated by modified
Nesselrod method, n=100), and postoperative results were analyzed. In group 4, the
average time for disappearance of wound edema was 4.9days, average time for
disappearance of wound pain was 9.0days, average time for painless defecation was 14.1
days, average time for complete wound healing was 28.4days. The main complications
were overgranulation, skin tag, anal discharge and pruritus. The overgranulation requires
curettage, the skin tags were resected under local anesthesia. Anal discharge and
pruritus were spontaneously disappeared after the healing of the wound. In group B, the
average time for disappearance of wound edema was 6.1 days, average time for
disappearance of wound pain was 6.3days, average time for painless defecation was
9.2days, average time for complete wound healing was 20.7days. The main complications
were skin tags, more prevalent than group 4, requiring resection under local anesthesia.
No infectious complications were noted in both groups. Consequently, the old concept
that open hemorrhoidectomy has advantage of less painful postoperative course than
semiclosed hemorrhoidectomy cannot be accepted. Semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy offers
more rapid loss of pain and more rapid healing of the wound than open
hemorrhoidectomy, without increased risk of infectious complications.
In conclusion, semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy is superior method to open
hemorrhoidectomy in third or fourth degree hemorrhoids.
Á¦ ¸ñ
°³¹æ½Ä Ä¡ÇÙ ÀýÁ¦¼ú°ú ºÎºÐ ºÀÇÕ½Ä Ä¡ÇÙ ÀýÁ¦¼ú °¢ 100¿¹¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñ±³¿¬±¸
Àú ÀÚ
¼Õ¿ì¿µ, ½É¸í¼®, °Áø±¹
¼Ò ¼Ó
¼Õ¿ì¿µ/±¹¸³°æÂûº´¿ø ÀϹݿܰú, ½É¸í¼®/±¹¸³°æÂûº´¿ø ÀϹݿܰú, °Áø±¹/±¹¸³°æÂûº´¿ø ÀϹݿܰú
ÃâÆÇÁ¤º¸
´ëÇÑ´ëÀåÇ×¹®ÇÐȸÁö 1997 | 13±Ç 3È£ 451 ~ 460, 10 pages
Å°¿öµå
Hemorrhoids;